Saturday, June 4, 2011

JEWISH BANKS HAVE DESTROYED OUR COUNTRY

Jewish banks masterminded crisis

0
Your rating: None
As long as a Jewish paper brought up the subject, let's not be bashful and give credit where credit is due. Let's not forget past World Bank presidents WOLFOWITZ and WOLFENSOHN.
Also, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, which, besides Ben SHALOM Bernanke, includes KROSZNER, KOHN and WARSH. Four of the five spots held by Sons of Khazar.... and Ben SHALOM Bernanke is also on the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund.
Toss in the head of the leading Fed bank, the New York branch that's overseeing this financial quicksand we're getting stuck into, GEITHNER.
And FULD of LEHMAN Brothers. Since you brought it up, Ynet, where is all those billions Lehman moved out of its overseas branches right before declaring bankruptcy?
“And Yahweh said to Moses ‘Tell the Israelites that both men and women alike are to ask their Egyptian neighbors for all their silver and gold…’ And so the Israelites did as instructed and asked the Egyptians to lend them all their gold and silver, which the Egyptians did, and the Israelites therefore plundered them…’
–The Book of Exodus
One more question, this time for the corpulent Abe Foxman of the ADL: Tell me, Abe old boy how a group of 15 million people world-wide out of a population of 6+ billion, how does that miniscule group manage to worm its way into the halls of finance all over the planet?
Jews constitute .0025 of the world's population, yet dominate financial institutions.
Call it the "Old OY" network.
And why has this same old money shell game been going on for thousands of years?
Scapegoated Abe? All trails lead back to the Jewish Money Masters, so how can that be called scapegoating?
Maybe it's just called saving your own ass.
The Federal Bank of Zion© hears your pitiful cries and is prepared to act.... to cover its own ass.
Hang you stockings with care, because there's martial law in the air.
Look at the Federal Bank of Zion© as if it were the "Hotel California."
You can check your money in, but can't check it out... not that you could even if we let you.. the money's "Already Gone."
Time to start singing that bluesy song.

That Israel's economy seems to have emerged relatively unscathed from the crisis has leant much ammunition to enemies of the Jewish state. As does the fact that many of the world's financial leaders are of Jewish descent. Figures such as US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, his predecessor Alan Greenspan, World Bank President Robert Zoellik, UK Business Secretary Peter Mandelson and the 2008 recipient of the Nobel Prize for economics, Paul Krugman, have all come under attack due to their heritage.

* As of June 1, 2011, the official debt of the United States government is $14.3 trillion ($14,344,655,966,314).[1] This amounts to:

• $46,415 for every person living in the U.S.[2]
• $122,043 for every household in the U.S.[3]
• $305,107 for every U.S. household that pays more in federal taxes than they receive in benefits from the federal government[4]

* Publicly traded companies are legally required to account for "explicit" and "implicit" future obligations such as employee pensions and retirement benefits.[5] [6] [7] The federal budget, which is the "federal government's primary financial planning and control tool," is not bound by this rule.[8] [9]
 
* As of September 30, 2010 (the end of the federal government's fiscal year), the federal government has:
 
• $7.3 trillion ($7,297,000,000,000) in liabilities such as federal employee retirement and veterans' benefits[10]
• $17.2 trillion ($17,195,000,000,000) in unfunded obligations for the Social Security program
• $22.8 trillion ($22,800,000,000,000) in unfunded obligations for the Medicare program
• $122 billion ($122,000,000,000) in unfunded obligations for two other "social insurance" programs called "Black Lung" and "Railroad Retirement"[11]

These unfunded obligations are referred to as "closed group present values" and are calculated in a manner that approximates how publicly traded companies are required to calculate their debts and obligations.[12] [13] [14] The figures represent how much money must be immediately placed in interest-bearing investments to cover the shortfalls between projected revenues and expenditures for all current taxpayers and beneficiaries in these programs.[15] [16] [17]

* Combining the figures above with the national debt and subtracting the value of federal assets, the federal government has $56.5 trillion ($56,529,800,000,000) in debt, liabilities, and unfunded obligations as of September 30, 2010.[18]

* This shortfall is 82% of the combined net worth of all U.S. households and nonprofit organizations, including all assets in savings, real estate, corporate stocks, private businesses, and consumer durable goods such as automobiles.[19] [20]

* This shortfall equates to:

• $182,914 for every person living in the U.S.[21]
• $480,949 for every household in the U.S.[22]
• $1,202,373 for every U.S. household that pays more in federal taxes than they receive in benefits from the federal government[23]

* These figures do not account for the future costs implied by any current policy outside of the “social insurance” programs listed above.[24]

* These figures are contingent upon the continuance of current federal law and "a wide range of complex assumptions" made by federal agencies."[25] Regarding this:

• Social Security's 2010 annual report states that "significant uncertainty" surrounds the "best estimates" of future circumstances.[26]
Medicare's 2010 annual report states that the program's financial projections "do not represent a reasonable expectation for actual program operations in either the short range … or the long range" because:
a) "Current law would require physician fee reductions totaling an estimated 30 percent over the next 3 years—an implausible result."
b) The 2010 Affordable Care Act [Obamacare] eventually reduces "Medicare prices for hospital, skilled nursing facility, home health, hospice, ambulatory surgical center, diagnostic laboratory, and many other services" to "less than half of their level under the prior law. …. Well before that point, Congress would have to intervene to prevent the withdrawal of providers from the Medicare market and the severe problems with beneficiary access to care that would result. … [This] would lead to far higher costs for Medicare in the long range than those projected under current law."[27]
 

No comments:

Post a Comment